It would be easy to believe that most, if not all, of the assertions raised in the earlier post fall into one of the categories listed below:
Informative and often amusing but mostly sketchy
At best misleading, otherwise clearly untrue and alarmist
Typical of the rubbish you read on the internet, complete nonsense
The ravings of a madman
Whatever your conclusions, the fact remains that the failing debt based global economy will be replaced with another system. While this series of posts contain some speculation, the creation of an Everything List is a technical possibility and is likely to be part of a technocratic alternative.
Many of the outcomes that follow from this assertion are deeply uncomfortable for those who believe in freedom and self determination, but what other conclusions can be drawn?
Perhaps the reader would be more convinced by an alternative narrative in which the following proposals are true:
The debt based economic system continues to expand and enrich the lives of its participants by simply creating more debt. To everybody’s surprise, the mathematical certainty that the Ponzi scheme will collapse is resolved peacefully and equitably in a manner yet to be defined and the severe social crisis that nations are facing around health, education, the funding of social care and pension provision are eventually solved by an innovative socio-economic policy that nobody has thought of yet.
The banking cartel which has established generational control over the world’s financial system proves to have no contingency to counter the inevitable collapse of the global economy and is quite content to let their wealth and power dissolve. All of the conspiracy theories regarding plans for a technocratic future prove to be baseless as it turns out this elite group has a sanguine attitude to the loss of power and are happy to let events simply play out. C’est la vie.
All the laws and regulations that determine the ownership of assets in the event of a debt collapse have really been created to protect individual wealth and not the interests of the banking cartel, because history has taught us that authority always has the public’s well-being at heart and has no desire for self-preservation.
Increased taxation and restrictions on personal freedom prove to be the solution to the build up of an invisible trace gas in the atmosphere, random acts of arson and the weather. The government has saved us again.
All the technologies that have emerged in the last decade, DNA profiling, face recognition, GPS tracking, cryptocurrencies, cellular wireless, biometrics, autonomous drones, surveillance cameras, smart devices and tokenisation will be used to build a more equitable, open and freedom-loving society.
Finally, given the chance of absolute control, the ruling class will denounce authoritarianism and embrace the universal concepts of self determination and freedom, because government really cares for you and only has your best interests at heart.
In the past people believed that a civilization that had the ability to construct an atomic bomb wouldn’t build one for moral and ethical reasons.
We now cherish the hope that in the future a civilization will not create an Everything List because of concerns around personal liberty and freedom.
Maybe, but I’m not so sure.
The Hotel California Syndrome
For the Everything List and the tokenised world to operate as designed, it’s an all-or-nothing proposition. Once you are on the list there’s no exit strategy and joining it is not going to be optional. When the United Nations describes their UN 2030 Agenda as being for “all people” and “fully inclusive”, you had better believe it. They even have a term for this policy - Leave no one behind (LNOB) - it’s the central promise (threat) of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and one of its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Once the Everything List is fully implemented, to exist outside of it will be meaningless as every social and economic interaction takes place under its control. You wouldn’t be able to travel internationally or pass through a local security boundary, make any type of purchase including food and clothing, hold or accumulate credit, obtain medical care, rent property, access an internet service, own a mobile device or drive an EV - in fact, you would be unable to interact with society in any meaningful way. Don’t make the mistake of believing you could escape to the hills and live in a “wild man of the woods” style either. These areas are under the control of the new Natural Asset Companies and are even out-of-bounds for token holders.
If you feel the need to raise some concerns with your new reality, a simple amendment to the Everything List would result in your privileges being withdrawn. As a final deterrent, destruction of your token would be a deletion of self, you would be reduced to a ‘nithing’ or non-person. On a positive note, there would be no requirement for prisons, because you live in one - the digital gulag.
Note: Digital gulag is a term defined in the book “Google Archipelago: The Digital Gulag and the Simulation of Freedom” by Michael Rectenwald
There’s only one way to avoid being an entry in the Everything List and that’s not getting listed in the first place. But that’s going to be tough - really tough.
As the debt based economic system slowly collapses our banking overlords will manufacture any number of crises to force the introduction of a digital ID. We are currently in a two-horse race between the introduction of a digital ID and a currency collapse. With this in mind it might be a good idea to start a book just to see how many of these flea bitten nags are entered into the Manufactured Crisis handicap race to be run at Fakenham, Norfolk, UK
Stealth, the driving licence approach - slow runner but a guaranteed starter
Fake pandemic - unlikely, fell at the first fence last time out
Real pandemic - risky but could be a finisher, a good each way bet
Kinetic warfare requiring a draft card - ditto
Cyber attack - possible front runner, currently making up ground
National power outage - late entry, could be a dark horse
Internet security to protect the children - another good each way bet
Immigration concerns - showing early promise, worth a punt
Climate emergency - heavily fancied but doesn’t run well on soft ground
War on terror - little widespread support
Alien invasion - rank outsider but the nerd’s favourite
The reason why there is such a wide and varied field is due to the fact that each fake crisis will only serve to enroll a certain proportion of the population. The health aspect captures the worried-well, other options corral climate alarmists and general conformists but all together they will only capture a minority of the population. The main purpose is to trial the technology and place the necessity of a digital ID into the public consciousness. The simple fact is you’re only looking at the undercard and not the Gold Cup event.
The overlords don’t want people to accept a digital ID, they want us to demand one and that will only occur when the population is separated from their food and/or their bank accounts.
The bank account approach is a stone cold certainty, but it has a number of risks. When the debt based economy finally collapses, the retail banks will fail and accounts will be frozen. What happens next will be government intervention, the assurance that your funds will be recovered into some form of CBDC and the promise of financial assistance in the short term for which you will have to register for a digital ID. The process will be sold as a method to prevent fraud and speed up payments and in truth, both cases have practical merit.
The concept of direct payments was tested in 2020 where it was branded as Stimulus Payments in the U.S. and Bounce Back Loans in the UK. Similar packages were announced in other developed nations such as Germany, New Zealand, Japan, France, Australia and Canada. In most cases the capital bypassed the banks and was placed directly into the accounts of individuals and businesses, but without a digital ID to track payments, the degree of fraud was massive.
The estimated level of criminal deception and error reported for 2020/21 in the UK was just over £1.2 billion, or 9% of the total disbursed. In the USA an Associated Press analysis found that fraudsters potentially stole more than $280 billion in relief funding; another $123 billion was wasted or misspent. The combined loss represented 10% of the $4.2 trillion the U.S. government disbursed. Although governments expressed concern of the losses, it was within the expected cost range for a technical trial and it had two other benefits. It acted as an efficient money laundering scheme for covert government programs and cemented the demand for a digital ID in the mind of the populus. However, one problem still remains with the bank account approach.
When the system goes down it’ll be quick, which means it could also be unpredictable and messy. The precursors will be plain to see in the financial markets months before but the populus will be told nothing other than the fact that the economy is performing well. The calming of the populus will be absolutely vital because their wealth has to be locked into the system in order to be stolen. Even a moderate percentage of people withdrawing credit from the banking system would be enough to cause a premature failure, which has to be avoided at all costs.
Trying to roll out a digital ID at the same time as the economic recovery package (CDBC) is far from ideal. It’s workable as a Plan B but if the digital ID could be in place before the collapse that would be a better Plan A. The playbook will be the same - create a crisis and propose the digital ID as the solution. It just needs something as vital as credit to be in short supply - something that everybody needs and nobody can do without. Something like food, perhaps.
The attack on the farming sector in the UK and across Europe over the past decade is well documented from regulations affecting land use, rewilding schemes, tax changes, and arbitrary Net Zero targets. As of 2023, the UK imports approximately 42% of the food it consumes meaning that a supply disruption, matched with a local outbreak of foot and mouth/bird flu/mad cow disease would quickly empty shelves in the supermarket.
At the first sign of stress, a rationing system will be introduced accessed through a mobile app. Registration will require a digital ID to ensure fairness and inclusivity.
Whether there’s enough life left in the financial system to even attempt Plan A is debatable as lines of stress are already emerging. We are more likely to end up with a quick and messy Plan B. The banks will close as normal on Friday but on Monday we will all wake up to a new world. From that point onwards our future as a free society depends on staying off the Everything List and this is when the gloves come off.
Seeing things for what they are.
There’s a wise saying that reads something like:
“The first step to solving a problem is recognising there is one”
And even if there isn’t, there should be, because this is where we are at the moment.
The first and most important action to staying off the list is to tune in to that nagging feeling you have that something is not quite right with the world at the moment and to start seeing things for what they really are. Some of the following statements might appear provocative and controversial but at this stage I really don’t care. We are running out of time. We have to wake up really quickly - the time for niceties and platitudes has passed.
The debt based economy is real and will fail.
This is an indisputable fact - the only question is when it will fail and what follows it.
On a positive note it could herald a golden age for humanity as the world economy once again adopts a sound money system based on gold, which restricts the power of authority to waste human resources on war and conflict. It could happen, but that outcome is not currently on the agenda. What is planned for us is something entirely different. We need to recognise that fact and act accordingly.
Man made climate change is a fraud.
There is no such thing as man-made climate change - it’s a complete falsehood in every respect. It is, however, a massive industry worth billions annually.
Whole industrial sectors, institutions, academic careers and personal reputations would be under threat if the theory was challenged. For this reason we are told that man-made climate change is now “settled science” - an oxymoron if ever there was one.
In our technocratic future a personal carbon budget is going to play a crucial role and therefore society has been subject to a decades-long plan to embed the idea that an invisible trace gas that makes up 420 parts in a million (0.04%) of our atmosphere controls human destiny. Spoiler alert - it doesn’t.
In some respects, you have to give some credit to the degree of mental conditioning that has allowed people to believe that the Earth’s natural carbon cycle can be managed and turned into a business opportunity. Of course, once this is achieved, doing the same for the water cycle and nitrogen cycle will be much easier - see the section on Natural Asset Companies.
The human race has always held a grandiose view of itself. We are remarkable from a historical perspective, but within geological timescales we are insignificant. A million years from now, a time period that’s not even a faint pencil line on the geological time scale, there will be no evidence that all the civilizations and technologies that serve as our legacy would have ever existed.
Our mayfly residency on this planet does not affect the climate in any significant way. But you have to believe it does, otherwise carbon credits and the rest of the technocratic energy based economy makes no sense.
Science is a captured business.
The vision of the dedicated idealist using the scientific method to advance the sum of human understanding is a long way behind us. Science is a business, and like all business it can be bought.
Need a “scientific” justification for Net Zero or carbon credits?
Endow a university with a Chair of Climate Research with a brief to report on the effect of rising CO2 levels on Antarctic sea ice. The total cost will be about £3 million with a couple of research assistants thrown in. Once the precedent is set, all you have to do is up-scale the operation.
How much “science” could you buy for £100 million?
How much “science” could you buy for £8 billion (Pfizer’s research budget in 2023)?
In the UK, most environmental research is funded through the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) an institution which prides itself on the research it has funded to “reduce the effects of climate change”. You could apply for a grant to study whether climate change even exists, but I doubt you’d get very far. So much for the independent scientific method.
There have been many works detailing the capture of the scientific world by industry and other special interests. Recently, Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, wrote:
“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness”
Unfortunately the situation is not fully understood by the public and any statement that starts “Scientists at XYZ University predict that…” will be taken as absolute fact rather than the output of a questionable computer model used to justify a larger research grant or the suppression of human rights, such as that which occurred during the lockdown in the UK.
In the recent past and in the near future an authority figure wearing a white coat will urge you to behave inhumanely and illogically and the mantra, as before, will be “trust the science”.
Prepare for that moment and act as your conscience dictates.
Government is not your friend.
If buying a scientist is expensive, buying a politician is a bargain basement deal.
It’s not really the fault of the politician that they are corrupt - it’s the population’s fault in believing it could be anything other than corrupt. The idea that any authority would exact control in a way that wouldn’t eventually benefit themselves is so naive as to be unbelievable. Authority requires the capacity to control others, a power that will inevitably corrupt those holding it.
The role and responsibility of the populace is to design a system that limits the power of the executive and applies checks and balances in order to keep the misconduct, dishonesty and fraud committed by those holding office to within manageable limits. In return for an easy life and to our eternal shame we have shirked that responsibility and simply handed over power without any oversight, passing control between two groups of autocrats as the election cycle moves round.
However, the danger is not in the malfeasance of the government - that’s always going to be the case - but the belief that authority is here to save and protect you in the event of a crisis. It isn’t. The actions will only serve to safeguard the authority of the government or failing that the authority of its members. Nobody is coming to save you, no government or individual.
This is really an important point. During the debt collapse nothing the governments will do will be in your best interest. Actions will only serve to maintain their control - after all, what else would you expect?
Staying off the list will require the return of individual responsibility, local control and a move away from centralised authority. As I mentioned it’s going to be tough - really tough.
The media is not there to inform you.
Buying a journalist is just pocket money, most would sell their soul for a byline. A bit like the myth of the idealistic scientist, the vision of the fearless investigative journalist pursuing truth whatever the cost is long gone. The role of the modern media is to keep you uninformed.
The media is owned by a number of major corporations who regurgitate news from three global agencies: Reuters, Agence France-Presse (AFP) and Associated Press (AP). What you perceive as the news is a highly selective version of events.
It’s not so much that the majority of the news is a straightforward lie, rather it’s in the curation of those events where the deception takes place. The headlines make the news along with the features on pages one to three. Conversely, if it doesn’t make the front pages the event didn’t take place or there is an implied assertion that the event was unimportant.
The effect is quite subtle but sometimes the veil slips, such as when a news story perhaps concerning a politician’s indiscretion or a corruption scandal makes the front page, runs across the news cycle for 24 hours and then completely disappears as if it never happened. The effect is so complete that sometimes you are left wondering whether you could have imagined the story.
Political demonstrations in support of government policy get a two-page colour spread, those against get nothing at all or a mention on an inside column which links it to a public disturbance. Groups fighting injustice are either categorized as terrorists or freedom fighters depending on the story the media wish to portray. Some groups can even transfer between the two classifications quite seamlessly without the public even noticing - Islamic militia being the best example. Freedom fighters in Syria and Afghanistan when facing the Russians, terrorists in Iran when fighting the U.S. One moment Abu Mohammed al-Golani is the former leader of an al-Qaeda affiliate with a $10 million bounty on his head, the next he’s Abu Mohammed al-Golani, greeted in the Whitehouse as a brave defender of freedom and ally of the West.
Whole countries can be presented in the same way. One moment Ukraine is “the most corrupt country in Europe, “a cradle of Nazi sympathizers” and the next “a stronghold of freedom and a beacon of democracy”. Nobody seems to notice the contradictions; they just absorb today’s manufactured version of reality and move on.
If any inconvenient truth emerges by mistake or gains traction through alternative media it’s simply labelled as a “conspiracy theory” which is a tag placed on any piece of information that authorities want you to dismiss or ignore. It’s the equivalent of the bright colouration of poisonous plants and frogs. It signals - leave alone and don’t go near, repeating this information will single you out as being outside the accepted social boundaries and open you up to ridicule.
There are quite literally hundreds of examples of news events and scandals that were originally labeled as conspiracy theories that turned out to be true after closer examination or the release of official documents. Whole books have been written covering some of these events:
The Watergate Scandal
Iraq’s Weapons of Mass Destruction
NATO’s involvement in European terrorism (Gladio)
The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment in the U.S.
The CIA’s mind control programme (MKUltra)
The Iran-Contra Affair (Drugs for Guns)
Tobacco industries knowledge of the health risks of smoking
The falsification of satellite images leading to the 1st Gulf War
Gulf of Tonkin Incident leading to the Vietnam War
The UN’s use of the tetanus vaccine to sterilize African women
The CIA’s plan to undertake terrorist attacks in the U.S. to instigate a war against Cuba (Northwoods)
Manipulation and censoring of social media during US elections
The man-made origin of the COVID-19 pandemic
This list also includes Operation Mockingbird, a covert CIA program launched in the late 1940s aimed at influencing domestic and foreign media for propaganda purposes through control of the media. Although dismissed at the time using the standard terms it was fully exposed in the 1975 Church Committee hearings set up to investigate intelligence abuses. The committee revealed that the CIA had paid journalists and media outlets to act as mouthpieces for propaganda.
Covering up government corruption, the crimes of industry and the covert programs of the security agencies is pretty much the everyday role for the media. Manipulation by the intelligence groups probably continues to this day, but on reflection this is just a conspiracy theory and not something you should give much thought to.
The main role of media is to keep the populace quiet and acquiescent as the value of currency is destroyed and the debt grows to unmanageable levels. Any suspicion that their life savings or pensions are at risk would cause a run on the banks, leading to instantaneous implosion of the system. The system must be kept running, like a patient on a life support system, until it’s time to pull the plug. The longer the pretence of normality can be maintained, the more time the system has to construct the digital prison.
Fortunately there is another way.